Public Domain Day 2019 and Yeshiva University Archives
Much has been written recently about the importance of this past January 1 to scholars and members of the creative professions. Referred to as the annual Public Domain Day, it was of particular significance this year because the extension from 75 to 95 years since publication of the copyright term of published works, which became effective in 1999 with the passage of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA), had finally been reached. At long last, published works would resume entering the public domain after the hard-stop imposed back on Jan 1, 1998, when copyrights on works published in 1922 had expired. The buzz throughout these interested communities was pervasive and palpable. After nearly a generation, 1923 had finally “arrived”.
Research libraries, with their vast holdings of out-of-print works, are central to the availability of these older items, and many have anticipated this milestone with exhibits or websites featuring new copyright-free collections. Additionally, in light of the significant e-books collaboratives and other digital initiatives that have emerged in the past 20 years, such as HathiTrust and Google Books, many works were already digitized and had been available in limited fashion or in snippets. Most likely the works from 1923 will be made available digitally almost immediately. (As of this writing, HathiTrust had over 53,000 items fully digitized in its collection of 1923 works.)
Several 1923 imprints held by Yeshiva University Libraries
While this event greatly impacts traditional library materials, its effect on archival materials is not as significant. Since these holdings primarily consist of unpublished works, different copyright rules apply. In fact, an equally noteworthy Public Domain Day for unpublished works took place on Jan. 1, 2003, arising from the expiration of a 25-year grace period for works of this type impacted by the 1976 Copyright Act (effective Jan. 1, 1978). Prior to this legislation, unpublished materials were not subject to *any* statutory copyright laws; they remained in copyright in perpetuity under common law enforced by the states so long as they remained unpublished and had not been registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. The 1976 Act expanded copyright protection to include unpublished items, for a term of the “life of the author plus 50 years” (later extended to 70 years by the 1998 CTEA). However, to prevent works whose authors had died more than 50 years earlier from passing immediately into the public domain on Jan. 1, 1978, the Act provided for a minimum period of protection of them for 25 years, making Jan. 1, 2003 the red-letter date when all heretofore not registered, unpublished works whose authors had died before 1953 would be in the public domain. Even though by the time this date arrived, the CTEA had pushed back this date to 1933, huge troves of archives and manuscript material still became fully and freely available for use and adaptation beginning that day. Since then, unpublished materials whose authors died more than 70 years earlier have continued to enter the public domain each January 1.
Copyright presents complex challenges for libraries and archives seeking to make their collections available digitally, and is something the staff of Yeshiva University Archives has spent much time assessing. Our rich manuscript holdings contain many items that are out of copyright, and a number of them are available through our Digital Library portal.
This is less true for our archival collections, which are primarily early-mid 20th century materials, and consist of many organizational records (whose copyright term is 120 years from the date of creation). Moreover, copyright issues are multiplied exponentially for archival collections, since they typically contain material created by many people other than the originator of the collection (consider, for example, the numerous letters written by others in an individual’s papers or organization’s records). The copyright status of these items is often untraceable, making them orphan works, with additional copyright issues to consider. Yeshiva University Archives staff members assess these factors, and many more in evaluating our materials for digitization. To do so requires us to remain abreast of the current scholarly literature and best practices of our profession. Furthermore, and to clearly define the terms of ownership going forward, we make sure to discuss copyright issues and digitization with potential donors of archival collections, and since 2011, our standard Deed of Gift agreement has included a clause transferring the donor’s intellectual property rights to the Archives.
Despite the numerous challenges of copyright, and other factors such as funding and staff time, Yeshiva University Archives has made some important collections available digitally, which can be browsed on our Digital Projects webpage. We hope to make more available in the future.
Posted by:
Deena Schwimmer, Archivist
-
Categories
- Annual reports
- Collection Highlights
- Databases
- Events
- General Health Issues
- Gifts
- Higher Ed News
- In Memory Of
- Libraries Update
- Library Classes
- Library Hours
- Library Service Alert
- Manuscripts and Archives
- Meet Our Students
- Mental Health Wellness Topics & Trends
- New books by YU faculty
- New Staff Member
- New to our Collections
- News at YU
- Of Historical Interest
- Of Literary Interest
- Uncategorized
- Yeshiva Academic Institutional Repository
-
Articles
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
-
Meta