Fair Use Week, 2019
Happy Fair Use Week! Fair Use Week 2019 runs from February 25 through March 1 and promotes the awareness and significance of this valuable legal doctrine that provides the framework through which use may be made of copyrighted material without permission. This limitation on creators’ intellectual property rights promotes creativity and progress and safeguards our First Amendment right to free speech.
Examples of fair use are pervasive and integral to a flourishing society. Quoting, showing clips or images in news reporting and historical works, parodying, mash-ups and remixing, home taping of television programs, copying book chapters or articles for classroom use, and creating internet search engines are just a few. Academic libraries depend on fair use to copy non-textual materials for patrons to use for research, display thumbnail images of works in their library catalogs, reproduce materials for publicity and display, and much more.

Judge Joseph Story
The doctrine of fair use was first codified in the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, however it had a long common law history that applied the somewhat vague standard of what a “reasonable rights” holder would consider to be fair. In his ruling on the 1841 Massachusetts case of Folsom v. Marsh, Justice Joseph Story first expressed what evolved into the “four factors” to be considered in a fair use determination, and which were codified in the 1976 Act. While there are no exact rules for applying the factors, there are numerous far-reaching and well-established precedents for the fair use examples above, and many others.
All fair use images from Fair Use Infographic, commissioned by Association of Research Libraries, designed by YIPPA, licensed under CC BY
The importance of fair use to holders of primary source materials such as Yeshiva University Archives and our patrons is self-evident, however what may not be well known is that it was only relatively recently that the doctrine could be applied with confidence to the rich unpublished materials that archives generally hold. In contrast to the lengthy tradition of fair use that existed for published works described above, it was the accepted opinion that this did not apply to unpublished materials. This distinction originated in an author’s common law “first right of publication” of unpublished materials, which was considered absolute, as well as from concerns for privacy, which were deemed to outweigh any benefit to society of their disclosure. Additionally, since copyright in unpublished materials never expired (as discussed in a previous posting), the result was that these materials were, strictly speaking, fully restricted from any real use without permission from the rights holder.
As a practical matter, however, scholars did, for example, cite from unpublished materials despite not having fair use to do so, and archivists likewise did make copies of materials for researchers for their private use. Even the National Archives funded copying to microfilm of its and other repositories’ holdings. All of these were, per the letter of the law, violations of the rights of authors or their heirs. These widespread practices were deemed necessary in the face of copyright laws that were out of date with modern scholarship practices (especially the “new” technologies of microfilming and fast photocopying). Without statutory protection or penalties, however, there generally was little risk from these activities, as rights holders could only sue for actual damages. Still, these practices did not have the force of law.
The 1976 Copyright Act was initially believed to have provided this much-needed relief to the scholarly community by extending federal copyright protection to unpublished materials, against which the claim of fair use, also codified in the Act, could now be made. However, rulings in several influential early court cases not only seemed to undermine any gains, but also gave rise to a trend that threatened to curtail the use of unpublished materials beyond what had existed even before the Act’s passage.
One such early case was Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, in which Harper, the publisher of President Gerald Ford’s memoirs, sued Nation Enterprises for making use of a purloined copy of the work to print an article revealing salient portions of its contents shortly before the book was published in 1979. The case was ultimately argued before the Supreme Court, which denied The Nation’s claim of fair use. Its ruling was based in part on the fact that the excerpted portions were still unpublished at the time they were used, which it said leaned against a finding of fair use. The Court also stressed the primacy of authors’ right to benefit financially from their work, evocative of the ‘first right of publication’ inherent in unpublished material from the pre-fair use, common law era.
While publishers rejoiced over this ruling, they and the overall scholarly community were dismayed by others that followed during the 1980s. In Salinger v. Random House, Inc., a biographer was prevented from quoting or even closely paraphrasing letters by J.D. Salinger. The decision again emphasized the unpublished nature of the letters. An even more alarming ruling was New Era Publications International v. Henry Holt and Co., in which the Church of Scientology wished to prevent use of unpublished materials in Bare-Faced Messiah, a work that disputed its founder L. Ron Hubbard’s account of events. In contrast to Salinger, where making use of the creator’s material was primarily for literary and stylistic purposes, here it was to in order to provide criticism and commentary, which are foundations of a democratic society and even examples listed in the Copyright Act as purposes favoring fair use. While the case was dismissed on a technicality, an appellate ruling strongly implied it would have otherwise succeeded, noting “fair use is never to be liberally applied to unpublished copyrighted material, even if the work is a matter of … high public concern.”
As a result of rulings such as these, the scholarly community essentially found itself in a worse position than it was before passage of the 1976 Copyright Act with regards to using unpublished materials. While offenders had previously faced minimal damage claims in cases that were seldom brought, creators could now bring to bear the much greater weight of a federal statutory violation in support of their claims. Coupled with a legal environment that seemed predisposed against a fair use defense, unpublished materials began to be considered too toxic for any meaningful use. Publishers were warier of permitting them in works, and some works could not be published at all. In some instances, archivists hesitated to make their collections available. The chilling effect on scholarship was notable and of much concern.
The outcry from historians, biographers, librarians, archivists, journalists, scholarly presses and others demonstrated the need for a statutory remedy, and legislation was passed by Congress in 1992 amending the Fair Use section of the Copyright Act. After listing the four factors it added “the fact that the work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors”. The Amendment’s intent was to remove the courts’ predisposition against fair use with regards to unpublished materials, and based on cases adjudicated in its aftermath, it became clear that it had been effective. The lockbox into which unpublished materials had been placed was opened.
As a right that belongs to everyone, fair use is something to be broadly celebrated this week, but perhaps especially so by those interested in unpublished materials, which it neither equally nor equitably applied to before the 1992 Amendment. Yeshiva University Archives has numerous collections with unpublished materials in its holdings of personal papers and institutional records. We invite you to make fair use of them this week and every week!
Posted by Deena Schwimmer, Archivist
-
Categories
- Annual reports
- Collection Highlights
- Databases
- Events
- General Health Issues
- Gifts
- Higher Ed News
- In Memory Of
- Libraries Update
- Library Classes
- Library Hours
- Library Service Alert
- Manuscripts and Archives
- Meet Our Students
- Mental Health Wellness Topics & Trends
- New books by YU faculty
- New Staff Member
- New to our Collections
- News at YU
- Of Historical Interest
- Of Literary Interest
- Uncategorized
- Yeshiva Academic Institutional Repository
-
Articles
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
-
Meta