Review of Dr. Raphael Shuchat’s Lecture onThe Vilna Gaon: Halakhist, Moderate Maskil or Kabbalist?
The Gaon of Vilna, Elijah ben Shlomo Zalman Kremer (1720-1797), was the topic of a special Revel lecture on Thursday, February 19th, “Vilna Gaon: Halakhist, Moderate Maskil or Kabbalist?” by Dr. Raphael Shuchat of Bar-Ilan University. This event was sponsored by the Esther Manischewitz Community Education Fund.
As the lecture title itself suggests, the Vilna Gaon’s persona, as well as his multifaceted scholarship and contribution to Jewish learning, are complex.
The persona of the Vilna Gaon is elusive for two reasons. To begin with, he spent his life secluded in the confines of his books, and actually taught only a small group of students. Furthermore, despite his great scholarship, the Gaon published nothing in his lifetime. His marginal glosses on the classic works of Judaism— such as the Bible, the Talmud, and Shulhan Arukh— were published after his death by his students. The only independent book (i.e., not a commentary) of the Gaon’s is Ayil Meshulash, a work on trigonometry published from his manuscript posthumously. The many other books attributed to the Vilna Gaon were actually compiled by his students—our only source of knowledge regarding the persona and scholarship of the great sage.
The first of the Gaon’s printed works was his commentary on Proverbs, published by his student Rabbi Menachem Mendel of Shklov, who in some of his later introductions celebrated the breadth of his teacher’s learning, including secular disciplines, such as mathematics and astronomy. The appearance of that biographical side of Gaon, troubled Rabbi Hayyim Volozhin—considered by many to be the Gaon’s main disciple—who wished to keep the Gaon’s interest in science and mathematics private. As Dr. Shuchat explained, Reb Hayyim was wary of what he considered to be misleading portrayals of the Gaon’s orientation. He therefore composed the introduction to the next publication of the Gaon’s writings: Shenot Eliyahu, his commentary on Seder Zera‘im (1799). There, Reb Hayyim describes the Gaon as a scholar singularly dedicated to Torah study, constantly donning tefillin, always remaining within the “four cubits of halakhah.” Conspicuously absent is any reference to secular learning. In contrast, Rabbi Israel of Shklov, in his introduction to Pe’at Hashulhan (the commentary of the Gaon on Shulhan Arukh), emphasized the Gaon’s knowledge of secular wisdom, echoing the depiction by Rabbi Menachem Mendel of Shklov. Likewise, Rabbi Yehuda Leib, the Gaon’s son, and his nephew Rabbi Yaakov Moshe of Slonim wrote an introduction to Be’urei HaZohar (commentary on the Zohar) that prominently mentions the expertise of the Gaon in astronomy, astrology, and algebra.
Some of the Gaon’s students acknowledged his expertise in secular wisdom, but found other ways to marginalize that aspect of his legacy. Rabbi Yitzhak Haver and Rabbi Eliyahu Rogeler, in their separate works dedicated to disseminating their master’s learning, denounced secular studies as an ideal: though the Gaon himself learned secular sciences, that path was permissible only to him, due to his outstanding level of Torah knowledge; others, however, must restrict themselves to studying the Talmud alone.
Through these examples, Dr. Shuchat demonstrated the struggle amongst the Vilna Gaon’s students to portray the image of their master in accordance with their own views regarding secular knowledge. Dr. Shuchat briefly pointed to a similar divergence of portrayals of the Gaon’s mystical learning. While all admit that the Gaon studied and commented on kabbalistic works such as the Zohar and Tikunei Zohar Rabbi Menachem Mendel of Shklov was the first to to describe the Gaon as a mystic in his own right in the theoretical and ecstatic sense. In fact, the Gaon’s interest in kabbalistic literature created a renewed interest in this often neglected field of Jewish learning. Evidence for the latter can be seen in the many kabbalistic books published in the Gaon’s name in the decades after his death as well as the many kabbalistic works published in Lithuania in the 50 years after his death.
Toward the end of his lecture, Dr. Shuchat noted another dimension of the Gaon’s legacy that was realized only in his students: a strong connection to Eretz Yisrael. The Gaon himself wished to make Aliyah, and even set out to settle in the holy land—but for some unknown reason was forced to return to Vilna. Yet a number of his students did, in fact, settle successfully in Eretz Yisrael.
In conclusion, Dr. Shuchat emphasized the multifaceted nature of the Gaon’s profound scholarship, which lends itself to multiple, even conflicting, portrayals— conveyed to us by his different students. The Gaon thus remains today the ever complex mystery, much as he was in his lifetime in Vilna, where, despite being a pillar of the community, his true essence was inscrutable, and his rich legacy irreducible to simple classification.
This review was written by Miriam Khukhashvili SCW ’15 and Revel ’17
-
Articles
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- February 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- September 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
-
Meta