Daniel Pollack on Use of Restraints on Children
Daniel Pollack, professor at Wurzweiler School of Social Work, has published “Research Is Needed to Evaluate the Use of Restraints on Children in Out-of-Home Care Settings” for the February 2020 issue of Policy & Practice.
* * * * *
As a last resort, there are times when properly secluding or restraining children in an out-of-home care setting can reduce their risk of injury. Contrarily, improperly secluding or restraining a child can lead to injury and liability. The use of seclusion and restraints (S/R) on children in education and health settings is not uncommon. [1] In out-of-home care settings we are unsure how frequently it occurs.
As a general rule, foster parents or staff in day care settings, or group homes, should use S/R only when a child is at risk of harming themselves or others, and verbal attempts have failed. The S/R episode should last only as long as is absolutely necessary, and only staff who have been trained in restraint techniques should use them. Further, staff should ensure that, while the child is secluded or restrained, the child’s health and bodily functioning are not impaired. Depending on the circumstances, medical personnel should be notified and involved.
All states have general regulations regarding the use of S/R in out-of-home care settings. What we don’t know is how frequently and under what circumstances they are employed, and how effective they are.
The Association of Children’s Residential Centers, in its 2017 publication, Best Practices for Residential Interventions for Youth and their Families, suggests the following research questions for courts to ask about S/R:
- Have youth ever been subjected to any physical, mechanical, or chemical restraints?
- How frequently do S/R incidents occur and what culturally informed steps have the program staff taken to prevent and reduce seclusion and restraint?
- Is the staff trained to recognize signs of distress in youth, to employ trauma techniques, and with the prevention and safe use of S/R?
- Are all S/R incidents comprehensively debriefed and alternatives explored between the staff involved and their supervisors?
- Are data on S/R collected, analyzed, and reviewed by residential program leadership, and are these findings used to improve practice and outcomes? [2]
Extensive research regarding the use of S/R has been done in health and correctional settings. Variables such as gender, verbal redirection, type of setting or unit, and time of day have all been studied, and the inappropriate use of S/R has been linked with avoidable injuries. One study termed such S/R incidents “a low frequency but high consequence event…” [3]
The child welfare world is continuously striving to engage in evidence-based practice (Figure 1). This means we are incorporating valid studies, modeling, reports, assessments, and analyses into our front-line practice and decision-making.
Right now, we need the S/R evidence in order to properly incorporate it into practice. Departments of human services and out-of-home-care facilities could greatly benefit by such research, in part to help clarify when S/R is used because children may be at imminent risk of harming themselves or others, and in part to help set a legal standard of care.
Reference Notes.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Restraint and Seclusion: Resource Document. Available: https://www.ed.gov/policy/seclusion/restraints-and-seclusion-resources.pdf; See also Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMHSA). (2011). Alternatives to seclusion and restraint in behavioral health care. Available at https://www.integration.samhsa.gov/clinical-practice/promoting_alternatives_to_ seclusion_and_restraint.pdf
- Association of Children’s Residential Centers. (2017). Best Practices for Residential Interventions for Youth and their Families. Available at https://www.ed.gov/policy/seclusion/restraints-and-seclusion-resources.pdf
- LeBel, J., Nunno, M. A., Mohr, W. K., & O’Halloran, R. (2012). Restraint and seclusion use in U.S. school settings: Recommendations from allied treatment disciplines. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82 , 75–86.
-
Categories
-
Articles
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- October 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
-
Meta